|
When we say that Azerbaijan rendered a great service to
Armenia by defeating it in the war, the neighboring country is offended. But it
really is. Azerbaijan has actually opened up great prospects for Armenia and
the Armenian people by ridding its neighbors of the status of an occupier.
Although only a couple of countries in the world officially recognized Armenia
as an aggressor, this fact was universally recognized at the unofficial level.
The country was not sanctioned, it was not condemned from international
platforms, it was not poked in international law, but it was silently ignored.
For almost thirty years, Armenia, as a member of the international community,
has been invisible and tacitly considered a non-handshaking state. Because,
despite the pro-Armenian sympathies bought with the money of the Diaspora, the
world knew what was what.
The fact of the occupation of Azerbaijani territories did
not require proof. Everything was happening in front of the world community.
Yes, they did not want to see Armenian atrocities and Yerevan's disregard for
international law. Nevertheless, heads of state practically did not travel to
Armenia, with the exception of their guardians, international events were not
held there, and Armenian leaders felt like poor relatives at meetings abroad,
or rather, they were made to understand who they were.
In short, no one wanted to deal with criminals, even if
there was an order not to send him to jail. For high-ranking officials in the
United States and Europe, where there was widespread pro-Armenian propaganda,
the same Serzh Sargsyan, for example, was always tacitly a non-handshake
person. Nikol Pashinyan's coming to power has somewhat changed the approaches
to the leadership, but not to the reputation of Armenia itself.
Everything changed after the Second Karabakh War. The visit
of Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan to Turkiye is a vivid example of
this.
Official contacts between Armenia and Turkiye began in 2021.
Before the war, these relations were conditioned by the liberation of the
territories of Azerbaijan, and Yerevan could not circumvent this condition. For
many years, he tried to overcome the realities, and once he almost succeeded,
but the occupation factor did not allow the parties to move beyond a certain
line.
The so-called "football diplomacy" failed
precisely for this reason. Ankara has not been able to cross this line. On
October 10, 2009, in Zurich, the Foreign Ministers of Turkiye and Armenia signed
the documents that went down in history as the "Zurich Protocols."
These were protocols on the establishment of diplomatic relations and protocols
on the development of bilateral relations. Let's say right away that the
documents have not been ratified by the Turkish parliament. Armenia waited nine
years and, in the end, was forced to take the same step. Turkiye refused to
ratify, as Baku did not welcome all this inappropriate peacemaking. It is not
even worth guessing who Ankara will choose between Baku and Yerevan in such a
situation.
Serzh Sargsyan really wanted to be called the president who
opened the Turkish border. At the same time, he did not want to give up not
only the occupation of Azerbaijani territories, but also his claims to Turkish
lands. A world with a country that not only calls your territories "western
Armenia" and paints your mountain on its coat of arms, but also accuses
you of "genocide" would look very strange. Sargsyan delayed
abandoning the protocols in the hope that the West would put the squeeze on
Ankara. But even the West could not outweigh the word spoken by Azerbaijan.
In April 2010, during the anti-nuclear summit in Washington,
Serzh Sargsyan met with then-Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan. The
meeting lasted an hour and a half and went badly, as it turned out later. After
the meeting, the parties declined to comment. After it, Sargsyan went to lay a
wreath at the grave of Woodrow Wilson, who promised Armenians half of the
Caucasus, and stated there that Turkiye, they say, "cannot speak with
Armenia and Armenians in the language of preconditions, we simply will not
allow it." In turn, Erdogan, speaking on the same day at the opening of
the Center for Global Islamic Studies at George Mason University, said that
"the decisions of the parliaments of various countries to recognize the
"Armenian genocide" are not for the benefit of Armenia." And he
stressed that history should be studied and evaluated by historians, not
parliaments.
This was the end of the Armenian-Turkish settlement
attempts. In 2017, Yerevan defiantly refused Ankara's invitation to participate
in the 25th BSEC Summit in Istanbul, sending its deputy foreign minister there
instead of the president.
The mask of the "peacemaker" quickly faded from Serzh Sargsyan's face. Despite the fact that the peace process seemed to be continuing between the countries, at one of the meetings with schoolchildren, the Armenian president, answering a question about the "return of western lands and Mount Ararat," said that they, the older generation, had already fulfilled their task by occupying Azerbaijani lands, and "western Armenia" was already theirs. the task, that is, the task of the new generation. In Turkiye, they heard Sargsyan and realized that Armenia is incurable. Official Ankara demanded an apology. Yerevan, of course, did not apologize. And what would be the point of apologies if the Armenian statehood, according to the Declaration of Independence, provided for the "return of Western Armenia", and these claims were enshrined in the Constitution.
Nikol Pashinyan wants to change the situation, and this can
only be welcomed. He was the first Armenian politician and leader to declare
the inadmissibility of claims to neighboring territories in the basic law. He
was the first to openly speak out against the propaganda of the "Armenian
genocide" and decided to question this fact. This is a very good start for
building Armenian-Turkish relations.
After talks with President Erdogan, Pashinyan met with
representatives of the local Armenian Diaspora on June 20. Armenians living in
Turkiye are more interested than anyone else in establishing diplomatic
relations and opening borders, therefore, according to the Armenian media,
Pashinyan was not asked any idiotic questions at the meeting.
Contrary to the claims of the Armenian propaganda,
Azerbaijan is not at all against the cooperation of Armenia and Turkiye. After
the fact of the occupation of our territories was eliminated, there were much
fewer obstacles to this. Let no one think that Baku hears only frivolous
statements by Pashinyan. Nothing like that. His positive steps are also heard
and appreciated here. Moreover, we understand what kind of opposition the
Armenian prime minister has to overcome in his own country. But what can you do
- the path to peace cannot be easy, especially for the side that is responsible
for so much hostility in the region.
Armenia has done things on its own and must fix everything
on its own. No matter how much it hurts.