US Deputy Assistant Secretary for European and Eurasian Affairs Eric Rubin: Our aim is to achieve a lasting and peaceful settlement of the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict based upon three core principles of the Helsinki Final Act
06 October 2011 [16:50] - TODAY.AZ
APA’s interview with US Deputy Assistant Secretary for European and Eurasian Affairs Eric Rubin.
Mr. Rubin, how do you find US-Azeri relations currently? What are the US priorities in Azerbaijan?
The United States values its strategic partnership with Azerbaijan,
which is based on shared interests in security (especially a peaceful
settlement of the Nagorno Karabakh conflict, counter-terrorism, and
Afghanistan), energy, and democratic and economic reform. Ambassador
Bryza recently noted that the U.S.-Azerbaijani “strategic partnership is
strong and is getting stronger”. I couldn’t agree more.
The United States deeply appreciates Azerbaijan’s contributions to
international security efforts. Azerbaijani troops have stood
shoulder-to-shoulder with U.S. troops in Iraq, Kosovo, and Afghanistan,
where 90 Azerbaijani troops currently serve. Azerbaijan continues to
play a key role on transportation of troops and non-lethal supplies in
support of the international effort in Afghanistan. The U.S. also supports Azerbaijan’s current efforts to help our European allies diversify their natural gas supplies.
As Secretary Clinton said when she visited Baku last year, our closest
relationships are with democratic states that respect the full range of
human rights of its citizens. The United States believes that
Azerbaijan’s future prosperity and stability are best served by
continued democratic and economic reform. Azerbaijan’s progress on
reform is the key to strengthening our bilateral relationship and to its
own stability.
Recently, the European Union revealed its intention to start talks
with Azerbaijan over construction of a Trans Caspian Pipeline to bring
natural gas from the Caspian region to western markets. But Russia
criticized this move. What is the U.S. view on the project?
The United States supports the development of a robust and competitive
energy sector in the Caspian region and beyond. Competition and
multiple export routes to market are in the interests of the United
States, Azerbaijan, and other Caspian energy producing nations. A Trans
Caspian Pipeline would contribute positively to the development of the
Caspian energy sector and to the diversification of Europe’s energy
supplies, but this is an issue for the European Union, Azerbaijan, and
Turkmenistan to decide.
The Southern Corridor is a key plank in the diversification of
European Energy supplies. Why does this matters to the US? What should
be done to make the Southern Corridor a reality?
The diversification of suppliers, transportation routes, and markets
enhances the economic and energy security of producer, transit, and
consumer countries. The United States has consistently supported the
development of the Southern Corridor. It generates prosperity for, and
strengthens the independence of, our energy producing allies in the
Caspian region. It also bolsters the energy security of our European
allies and strengthens their cooperation with each other.
To make the Southern Corridor a reality, however, Azerbaijan and Turkey
must finalize a gas transit agreement. We have urged the two sides to
complete their negotiations and sign the agreement as soon as possible.
No matter which export route is ultimately chosen, new gas sources will
flow westward through new routes.
A long-standing conflict between Azerbaijan and Armenia over
Karabakh has been a major problem for Azerbaijan. The latest talks
between the sides have failed, as US and other mediators are keen to
find a peaceful solution. Do you see any chance to reach peace agreement
in the near future? Do you see any international example for autonomy,
which might be introduced in Karabakh in order to resolve the conflict?
The United States remains committed to working with the parties, as a
Co-Chair of the OSCE Minsk Group, to achieve a lasting and peaceful
settlement of the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict based upon three core
principles of the Helsinki Final Act: the non-use or threat of force,
territorial integrity of states, and equal rights and self-determination
of peoples.
While the Basic Principles were not finalized in Kazan, Presidents
Aliyev and Sargsian, in their joint statement with President Medvedev
following the Kazan Summit, noted that they reached mutual understanding
on a number of issues. They also agreed to continue to work on the
Basic Principles as a framework for a comprehensive peace settlement.
With the assistance of the OSCE Minsk Group Chairs, the parties continue
to work to find common ground. The United States remains engaged in
the Minsk Group process -- at the highest levels -- to assist the sides
in clarifying their positions and bridging the differences needed to
reach agreement.
There is no military solution to the conflict. Only a negotiated
settlement can lead to long-term peace and stability, opening new
opportunities for regional development and cooperation.
/APA/
Views: 1192
Connect with us. Get latest news and updates.