TODAY.AZ / World news

Armenia's Metzsamor nuke plant awaits IAEA inspection

06 May 2011 [12:27] - TODAY.AZ
Officials in Armenia have long downplayed the potential threats posed by the aging Metzsamor nuclear power plant, not far from the capital city of Yerevan. At the same time, the facility has been repeatedly ranked as one of the world’s most dangerous nuclear power stations.

To reassure a jittery international community in the wake of Japan’s nuclear troubles, the Armenian government has invited International Atomic Energy Agency inspectors to subject the Metzsamor plant to a "stress test," reported.

The 12-person IAEA team is due to be in Armenia from May 15 to June 1. The 35-year-old Metzsamor plant, which supplies about 40 percent of the country’s energy needs, has long been a target for criticism. The plant is supposed to be shut down after the construction of a new facility in 2016, but, with five years still to go to decommissioning, there is mounting pressure to ensure that no mishaps occur during this twilight phase of operations.

The IAEA tests will attempt to determine how the nuclear plant would respond to an earthquake or a tornado, said State Nuclear Safety Regulatory Committee Chairman Ashot Martirosian. Eager to downplay possible doomsday scenarios, Martirosian underlined that the visit is "standard practice."

"Independent experts are being invited to give their expert opinion," he said. "After this, we will draw conclusions and introduce changes, if necessary."

Other international experts will review procedures – ranging from accident management to possible power failure. Metzsamor management will submit the findings to the State Nuclear Safety Regulatory Committee by late September, Martirosian said.

In 1988, Metzsamor was shut down in the wake of the 6.9-magnitude earthquake at Spitak. Even so, many Armenian nuclear-safety specialists argue that the station is safer than Japan’s stricken Fukushima facility. Martirosian said that, unlike Fukushima, Metzsamor’s “two-loop steam cycle” could enable generators to release steam into the air under high temperatures without also releasing radioactive materials.

Some environmentalists, however, think such confidence is misplaced.

"The attitude toward nuclear power stations has changed across the world," said Karine Danielian, a former minister of environmental protection who now heads the nongovernmental organization For Sustainable Human Development. "Even if Japan, one of the most progressive countries, is at risk, how can one consider our own nuclear power station to be ‘safe’?"

Some of Armenia’s neighbors have asked the same question, though the identity of the country asking the question appears to follow diplomatic fault lines. Strategic allies Turkey and Azerbaijan, neither of which have diplomatic ties with Armenia, have called for Metzsamor to be shut down. The plant is located 16 kilometers from Armenia’s border with Turkey. Georgia and Iran, however, have not yet issued such a statement.

Responding to international criticism, Armenian Energy and Natural Resources Minister Armen Movsisian told that "We must not take all these statements seriously."

"We are open; anybody can come and see our nuclear power station. If any problem occurred, the international agency [IAEA] would be the first to ban its operation," Movsisian said.

One environmental activist believes the concern about Metzsamor’s continuing operations are justified.

"How can we talk about security if the nuclear plant is constructed in a seismic zone, and is located in a densely populated settlement, instead of being 200 kilometers away [the distance between Fukushima and Tokyo] from residential areas?” asked Hakob Sanasarian, chairman of the Greens Union of Armenia. "It is constructed near an agricultural complex, a huge artesian reservoir, near highways and the airport."

State Nuclear Safety Regulatory Committee Chair Martirosian dismissed Sanasarian’s objections as groundless and "for show."

"These declarations are not based on studies," he said.

Citing studies dating back to the Soviet era, Danielian, a former environmental protection minister, also expressed misgivings.

"As an environmentalist, I understand the existing hazards, and as a citizen, I realize we have no alternative option to the nuclear plant," Danielian said. "[W]e just have to hope that the international review will give us an opportunity to exploit the nuclear power station safely."

/Hurriyet Daily News/

Print version

Views: 1450

Connect with us. Get latest news and updates.

Recommend news to friend

  • Your name:
  • Your e-mail:
  • Friend's name:
  • Friend's e-mail: