|
|
Azerbaijan has taken a serious approach to returning the
Albanian heritage from oblivion, where it was sent by the Armenian church and
propaganda. This heritage is being returned with considerable difficulties, as
it is necessary to overcome the layers of lies and falsifications that have
become entrenched over decades.
The recent trip of foreign diplomats to the liberated
territories caused a serious upheaval in the Armenian scientific and
ideological environment. However, the consequences in the global arena turned
out to be not as long?lasting
and tangible as expected. The topic of the allegedly destroyed pseudo?Armenian heritage in
Karabakh has lost its relevance, as has the “Armenian
question” as a whole.
We do not claim that over the two hundred years of their
presence on Azerbaijani lands, the incoming Armenians did nothing but
appropriate and falsify what was not theirs. They undoubtedly created something
as well. But this is not the antiquity they tried to pass off as their own. It
must be acknowledged that the process of falsification and appropriation of the
ancient history of this region, especially during the occupation period, was
quite successful. The fact that foreign experts and scholars were drawn into it
lent the process an aura of legitimacy; the results of the falsifications ended
up in international sources, thereby gaining the right to exist. Just like
Erebuni, which never existed in history, but which made it possible to extend
the age of Yerevan, which was already 500 years old, back by 2,300 years.
The statements and comments of the Armenian side show
disappointment and even surprise at the lack of a violent reaction to the
situation around the Ganjasar monastery after Baku officially laid out the
truth about the history of this temple in front of 150 diplomats from 58
countries. We remind our neighbors that the noise they made around another
pearl of the Albanian spiritual heritage, the Khudaveng monastery in Kalbajar
district, was no less senseless.
After the liberation of Kalbajar, Khudaveng remained under
Armenian control for some time. Russian peacekeepers were stationed on the
territory, guarding the peace of the invaders. Meanwhile, in Echmiadzin, they
were looking for a way to secure the monastery and the surrounding lands for
the Armenian church and to establish a corridor for pilgrims to reach it. But
no solution was found. In April 2024, the peacekeepers withdrew from the
Khudaveng complex due to the start of the process of withdrawing the Russian
peacekeeping forces from Azerbaijan. It should be recalled that the entire
Russian peacekeeping contingent was completely withdrawn from Karabakh by June
of the same year.
Armenian and anti?Azerbaijani propaganda actively promoted the idea of an
alleged threat hanging over the Christian monuments of Karabakh and Zangezur
during and after the liberation war. The idea was instilled that Azerbaijanis,
as they liberated the territories, would demolish crosses, destroy churches,
and take revenge for their mosques. The Azerbaijani side greatly disappointed
those who expected to see the walls of Khudaveng shelled from cannons or the
ruined belfry of Ganjasar. None of that happened. However, propaganda continued
in various forms and on different platforms.
Ganjasar remained in the territory controlled by the
separatists, but Khudaveng was returned to Azerbaijan as part of the document
on Armenia’s surrender. And everyone was very concerned about how long the
Russian post would remain there. In pro?Armenian circles in Russia, they lobbied to keep the post
there forever and to turn this territory into some kind of enclave (either of
Armenia or of Russia) in order to protect it from the “barbarians”.
The peacekeepers and the Armenian monks who remained in
Khudaveng tried to obstruct the Albanian?Ossetian Christian community’s
attempts to visit its historical church. The Russian peacekeepers demanded
strict coordination of visits, as if the church were not located on Azerbaijani
territory. Meanwhile, the Armenian monks established rules, restricted the
space for worship, and prohibited access to many rooms in the complex. However,
the Azerbaijani side once again demonstrated unique patience and, without any
incidents, brought the situation to the point where there were no outsiders
left in Khudaveng.
True, not only the outsiders were gone, but also many
artifacts.
When Kalbajar returned to Azerbaijan, in November 2020,
Armenians, with the assistance of peacekeepers, removed the bells, khachdashes,
and church utensils from the monastery. The occupiers did not expect the RMC to
establish a post there. When the peacekeepers took control of Khudaveng, the
abbot, Hovhannes — a well?known
Armenian terrorist — joyfully transported all of this
back, believing that the complex would remain under Armenia’s control forever.
However, not everything was returned. Moreover, as they were finally leaving
the monastery, the Armenians additionally took with them many valuable
artifacts.Despite all the attempts by the Armenian side to disown the theft,
the stolen items and artifacts later repeatedly resurfaced both in Yerevan and
at exhibitions abroad. Moreover, the Armenians themselves actively promoted
their “restoration” work during the occupation years, demonstrating the process
of falsifications and not thinking that this would ever come back to haunt
them.
In 2014, the “restoration” of the monastery’s unique
frescoes began. It’s hard to imagine, but when leaving Khudaveng, the occupiers
stripped these valuable examples from the walls.
Let’s give the floor to the Azerbaijani historian and
political scientist, director of the Center for Caucasus History, Rizvan
Huseynov:
The Armenians, as they were leaving Khudaveng, stole the
relics of Saint Dadi, after whom they themselves named the monastery —
Dadivank. The veneration of Dadi as a disciple of the Apostle Thaddeus did not
prevent them from committing this sacrilege. I consider these actions not only
a manifestation of disrespect for their own faith but also an insult to the entire
Christian world.
Some people think that by committing this vandalism, the
Armenians supposedly saved their holy relics from desecration by the
“barbarians,” that is, us. But in reality, everything is explained in a much
less romantic way.
On the left and right walls of the church, there were large?scale frescoes. As they
fled, the occupiers stripped these ancient images from the walls, although
during the occupation they had, so to speak, restored them for several years
and presented them as examples of Armenian church painting. One wall depicted
the Albanian prince Hasan?Jalal
Dovla with his mother, Arzu?khatun.
And on the opposite wall there was a huge image of Saint Nicholas the
Wonderworker. Why did the images disappear? The thing is that the fresco depicting
Hasan?Jalal
with his mother clearly shows that the people depicted there are not Armenians.
As for the fresco with Saint Nicholas the Wonderworker, it’s even simpler. Armenians are Monophysites; they do not
recognize Saint Nicholas the Wonderworker as a saint, so his image could not
possibly have appeared on the wall of an Armenian church, let alone on such a
large scale. Saint Nicholas the Wonderworker is considered a saint by the
Monophysite Albanian churches and by the Orthodox. Leaving the fresco would
mean leaving proof that Khudaveng does not belong to the Armenian Church, and
its founders were not Armenians. Moreover, the tradition of painting churches
has never belonged to the Armenian Gregorian Church.
I was in Khudaveng and saw the consequences of the barbarism
committed by the occupiers. Unfortunately, they had quite a lot of time to do
this. After the occupation of Kalbajar, “restoration” work and illegal
archaeological excavations were carried out there between 1997 and 2011, funded
by the diaspora and Armenia. During these works, many Albanian burial sites
were looted; the “restoration” itself was carried out without any regard for
established standards, and imported materials — tuff from the Ania quarry
in Armenia — were widely used.
After the liberation of Kalbajar, Azerbaijan, for reasons of
humanism, allowed the Armenian side to stay in Khudaveng for some time. And it
used this time for nefarious purposes.
Information about the frescoes and khachdashes illegally
taken by Armenians from the Khudaveng monastery was entered into the Interpol
database. This was reported to journalists by Sabina Hajiyeva, head of the
State Service for the Protection, Development and Restoration of the Cultural
Heritage of Azerbaijan.
According to her, when leaving the Kalbajar district, the
occupying forces looted the Khudaveng monastery complex, taking to the Republic
of Armenia the crosses, bells, and other elements that belonged to the complex,
including frescoes that were cut from the walls and stolen; these frescoes were
later displayed abroad at various foreign exhibitions as “works of art from
Armenia.” “In this regard, on October 9, 2025, information about the frescoes
and khachdashes dismantled from the Khudaveng Monastery and illegally removed from
the country was entered into Interpol’s database ‘Stolen Works of Art’. This
provides for international law enforcement mechanisms for the return of these
artifacts to the Republic of Azerbaijan in the event that they are found on the
territory of one of Interpol’s member states,” Gadzhieva said.
According to media reports, in December 2020, an exhibition
held in Yerevan featured a bell, stone inscriptions, frescoes, carpets, and
other cultural heritage items belonging to Azerbaijan and stolen from the Khudaveng
monastery complex. Subsequently, in the spring of 2022, the stolen artifacts
were exhibited in several Italian cities.
The theft of artifacts is not new. Such crimes occur all
over the world. However, in the case of Khudaveng, the situation is special —
the thief is known, and there is no need to look for him. The criminals who
stole the archaeological materials illegally obtained by Armenian black
archaeologists during excavations in Agdam, Shusha, and Azykh are also well
known by name. The discovered samples were taken to Armenia shortly before the
end of the war. Now these materials, which belong to Azerbaijan under
international law, are being displayed by the Armenian side on various
platforms and presented as evidence of the “Armenian history” of Karabakh.
The thieves are known. Will it be possible to make them
return the stolen items? To be honest, it’s hard to believe. There have always
been concessions for Armenians, and it’s very doubtful that yet another
exhibition somewhere in Europe will be sealed because a thief put the stolen
items on display.
But that’s not the main point. The main point is that the occupier is left with only scraps and fragments, while the monuments themselves are now in safe hands. Azerbaijan, with the assistance of the best foreign specialists, will do everything possible to restore the historical appearance of ancient Albanian temples. Experience in this work has already been gained on the liberated lands.
Print version