|
|
The ideological transformation of Armenian society is a very
complex process. So far, the authorities have not had much success. And it's
not about the weakness of the ruling team. It is impossible to destroy in six
years what has been built and cemented for two centuries.
The myth of the so-called "genocide of 1915"
caused particularly great damage to the Armenian identity. This seed fell on
fertile ground, which had already been plowed by the church and the Dashnak
movement, which laid the foundation for the Armenian terror. It is a lie that
Armenians developed cave-like emotions towards their neighbors after the events
in the Ottoman Empire and can be justified by "noble revenge." They
began to be cultivated immediately after the resettlement of this ethnic group
to the South Caucasus, as fuel for the expansion of their habitat. By 1915, the
Armenian mentality was ready to accept this, sorry, propaganda sperm and give
birth to a monster.
The hatred and sense of ethnic superiority fostered by the
criminal church have produced the expected results. However, it was only after
the Second World War, when the worldwide recognition of the Holocaust prompted
the Armenians to become more active. It's hard to believe that the tragedy of
the Jewish people could have caused envy, but it did. "How are we worse
off?" - the ideologists of "from sea to sea" thought and
launched a flurry of activity around the world through the diaspora, which had
secured preferences for itself even before the Second World War, playing on traditional
European Turkophobia. After the events of the First World War, Armenians moved
to Europe and America, clearing a place for themselves in the sun with pitying
stories and tears. Turkophobia and Islamophobia have helped open many doors for
them. By the way, in September 2023, the Armenians of Karabakh counted on the
same effect, having left Azerbaijan en masse in the hope of moving on a tearful
wave to Europe and the United States. But neither of them accepted them. Times
have changed.
It is no secret that the myth of the "Armenian
genocide" was born in the middle of the last century in the USSR against
the background of Turkiye's accession to NATO, and was spread around the world
by the Diaspora. Interestingly, the Armenian theme has always been met with the
same understanding in both the West and the East. This is the only issue on
which the poles had no discrepancies. Due to this, the "genocide",
which had no place in history, became the subject of political pressure,
blackmail and scientific research, extending its coverage to the Karabakh
conflict, which was also overgrown with myths and fantasies.
We started talking about this today in connection with the
ongoing fuss in Armenia over the dismissal of the director of the
Museum-Institute of "Genocide" in Yerevan. The day before, the
Minister of Education of the Republic of Armenia, Zhanna Andreasyan, was
bombarded with questions about this
It should be recalled that the former director of the institution, Edita Gzoyan, was fired due to the fact that during the visit of US Vice President Jay D. Vance to Yerevan, she undertook to educate the distinguished guest on the topic of the "Artsakh genocide" and other "Armenian genocides" in Azerbaijan. Accompanying Vance to Tsitsernakaberd, Gzoyan took with her the relevant propaganda literature on the "Artsakh issue" and handed the books to the American. Well, to read it during the flight to Baku and demand that Azerbaijan immediately return the Armenians to Karabakh.
Having learned about such arbitrariness of the head of a
state institution, the Prime Minister of Armenia demanded that the
"patriot" write a letter of resignation. Nikol Pashinyan called
Gzoyan's behavior provocative and contrary to the government's foreign policy
course. This lady was appointed director just two years ago, when ideological
transformations had already begun in Armenia. But Gzoyan has worked in a phobic
institution for more than twenty years and therefore did not pay attention to
the changes in the rhetoric of the authorities. She must have been seriously
preparing for Vance's visit, collecting books that should be secretly handed
over to the distinguished guest. Knowing Pashinyan's attitude to the issue of
"genocide" and his position in the normalization process with Azerbaijan,
she chose a convenient moment and presented the books to the US Vice President.
In normal States, such steps are not taken without
coordination with official structures. The so-called Armenian
"genocidologists"... Yes, such a specialty has been invented. So,
Armenian "genocidologists" and their foreign counterparts claim that
the Museum-Institute of "genocide" is not a tourist site, but a
serious research institution. If so, then this office should realize that the
vice president of the world's largest power is not a tourist to shove brochures
and brochures with bright pictures into his hands at his discretion. The
anti-Azerbaijani materials were a provocation, and not so much against
Azerbaijan as against the Armenian authorities themselves. While the country's
leadership is trying its best to create a positive image for the Republic of
Armenia in the eyes of its neighbors, someone named Edita Gzoyan is ruining his
efforts. Moreover, it ruins the efforts of not only Pashinyan, but also the
president of the United States itself, who considers himself a benefactor of
the Armenian-Azerbaijani settlement.
The world is tired of the "genocide of 1915". This
myth has outlived itself, outdated, worn out to the holes. It can now be sold
only in one set with the "genocide of Artsakh". This topic is more
recent and has not yet become so boring to those circles that have always
supported the "Armenian issue", built a career on it and made money.
Now the acting director has been appointed instead of
Gzoyan. Rumors about his "connections with Baku" are already
spreading about him. This means that the brain of this official is not infected
with the virus of cave hatred. It is unlikely that he will stay in this post
for long. They simply won't let him work. And the former director expects that
if (God forbid for Armenia) Pashinyan loses the election, she will be returned
to her former post with music and a red carpet.
The current government has resolved the issue of Gzoyan
irrevocably. "A management issue has arisen. That's the point, and the
issue is settled for me," Andreasyan told reporters, adding that the issue
of reinstating Gzoyan would not be raised, but she could continue working as a
scientist, including at the Museum itself.
Unfortunately, the "Artsakh research department"
in this institution has not been closed. He continues to work, and the
so-called scientific research in this direction continues. There is a whole
staff there, and the Minister of Education has stated that they can continue
their "scientific activities." At the same time, insider sources of
the Armenian media note that Andreasyan did not give any clear answers
regarding the work of this department.
It would be good if there was no "Artsakh
department" in the institution from which the provocateur Gzoyan was
asked. A scientific institution in a country should not be prohibited from
opening branches dedicated to other countries and regions. It is also
impossible to forbid Armenian historians to study the history of the Karabakh
region of Azerbaijan. But this applies only to cases where research is purely
scientific in nature and is not a springboard for political provocations,
territorial claims and armed terror. The Armenian "genocidology"
deals with just the latter.
It is funny that the "genocidologists" of Armenia, the United States and Europe, who signed the appeal to the Government of the Republic of Armenia, declare that the museum is a scientific center, and its leadership, they say, should be protected from political interference. It is strange considering that the institution operates according to the instructions of the diaspora and even the diaspora directs the board of trustees. The institution is actually a tool for influencing and maintaining a toxic outbreak in the South Caucasus. Gzoyan hardly expected to lose her post, because so far the so-called museum has done what it wanted, and there have never been any questions about it. The first alarm bells sounded when Nikol Pashinyan questioned the traditional interpretation of the events of 1915. And now he has openly opposed another provocation by the so-called scientists. Because it cannot allow "scientific studies of the genocide in Artsakh" to be conducted under the supervision of the Diaspora against the background of the peace process and all attempts to convince Baku that the Armenian society is capable of correction.
It is the Diaspora that is most outraged by recent events.
The chairman of the museum's Board of Trustees, Raymond Gevorgyan, resigned in protest.
Gevorgyan represents the Diaspora. As you can learn from the Armenian media, he
is a French (who would doubt) historian who has devoted himself to the study
and teaching of the "Armenian genocide". In the past, he was the
director of the Nubarian Library in Paris, and now teaches at the University of
Paris Saint-Denis and directs research at the Institut Français de
Geopolitique. In 2010, Gevorgyan was awarded a special prize by the then
President of Armenia, Serzh Sargsyan, for his invaluable contribution to the
dehumanization of the Armenian mentality.
The "debacle" committed by Pashinyan in the museum
is a signal to the Diaspora that the Armenian state intends to cut this
umbilical cord. Yerevan cannot tell the diaspora, but it is quite possible to
block this channel. On Monday, the Chief Commissioner for Diaspora Affairs,
Zare Sinanyan, told reporters that official Yerevan had not given any
instructions to the Diaspora structures regarding statements about Karabakh.
And that's understandable. Because Armenia was created by
the Diaspora, not the other way around. Until now, the Armenian state has
served as a toy of world Armenians, and it was behind all the tragedies that
have befallen the region in recent decades. Pashinyan wants to turn the country
into a real state, and for this it is important to get the main obstacles out
of the way.
Print version